When it comes to capturing those special moments of your wedding day, two popular approaches to wedding photography are traditional and photojournalistic. While both styles can create beautiful and meaningful photographs, there are some distinct differences between them. Traditional wedding photography focuses heavily on posed shots with the goal of capturing the happy couple and their guests in the best light.
Photojournalistic wedding photography, on the other hand, is more about capturing the natural moments of the day as they unfold. Both styles have their merits, and ultimately the choice depends on the couple’s individual tastes and expectations. In this blog post, we’ll explore the differences between traditional and photojournalistic wedding photography in greater detail to help you decide which style is right for you.
1. Types of Shots Captured
Traditional wedding photography is all about capturing posed shots of the happy couple and their guests. The photographer will often ask the couple to pose in certain positions, or take certain groups of people in the same frame. The goal is to get traditional posed shots of the couple, their family and friends, often with everyone looking at the camera and smiling.
Julia Rintz Photography, on the other hand, focuses on capturing candid shots of the couple and their guests. The photographer will often capture moments as they happen, often with little to no direction from the couple. This style of photography is less posed and more natural, allowing for more natural and true to life shots.
2. Length of Coverage
While traditional wedding photography coverage is typically for several hours, usually determined by the size of the wedding, photojournalistic coverage is usually for the entire day, from the start of preparations to the end of the reception. This allows the wedding photographer to capture a wide range of moments and emotions, from the bride and groom getting ready to the couple’s first dance. This type of coverage also allows the photographer to capture candid and spontaneous moments, which are often the most memorable and meaningful.
3. Editing Style
The third difference between traditional and photojournalistic wedding photography is the editing style. Traditional photography often involves heavier editing, with the photographer using tools such as Photoshop to enhance colors, lighten dark areas, and remove unwanted elements from the photo. This can result in a more polished, idealized look.
Conclusion.
It is clear that traditional and photojournalistic wedding photography both have their benefits and drawbacks. Traditional wedding photography allows for the capture of classic poses of the couple and their guests, while photojournalistic wedding photography can capture candid moments and emotions.
Ultimately, the decision of which style of wedding photography to use is up to the couple, as each offers unique features. Ultimately, both styles of wedding photography can be used to capture the special day and create a beautiful wedding album.
